Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
This court has previously considered and rejected some of the issues now raised by the defendant on the appeal of his codefendant Anthony Finley, with whom he was jointly tried (see, People v Finley, 145 A.D.2d 434). None of the contentions raised by the defendant requires a different result.
We have examined the additional contentions advanced by the defendant on his appeal and find them to be either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Bracken, J.P., Lawrence, Kooper and Sullivan, JJ., concur.