LaCOUR v. STATE, DEPT., TRANS. DEV

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 87-1051.

Attorney(S)

Aaron Harris, Opelousas, for
Watson, Murchison, Crews, Arthur Corkern, William Crews, Jr., Natchitoches, for O.
Gregory Wright, R. Stuart Wright, Natchitoches, for N.
Guglielmo, Lopez Tuttle, John R. Walker, Opelousas, for defendant/appellant/
Domengeaux Wright, Thomas R. Edwards, Opelousas, for defendant/

Judges

FORET, Judge.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 87-1051.

Attorney(S)

Aaron Harris, Opelousas, for
Watson, Murchison, Crews, Arthur Corkern, William Crews, Jr., Natchitoches, for O.
Gregory Wright, R. Stuart Wright, Natchitoches, for N.
Guglielmo, Lopez Tuttle, John R. Walker, Opelousas, for defendant/appellant/
Domengeaux Wright, Thomas R. Edwards, Opelousas, for defendant/

Judges

FORET, Judge.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

OLEA D. LACOUR, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. STATE OF LOUISIANA, THROUGH THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.

FORET, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the consolidated case of Fruge v. State, DOTD, 536 So.2d 745 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1988), in which a separate opinion is being rendered this date, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Costs of this appeal are to be divided equally between the LaCour and Fruge appellants.

AFFIRMED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

OLEA D. LACOUR, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. STATE OF LOUISIANA, THROUGH THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.

Comments