AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CHRISTOPHER N. SAVAGE, Appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We find that there was legally sufficient evidence to support the finding of the trier of fact that the requisite intent to kill was proven beyond a reasonable doubt. The victim died of 17 separate stab wounds, 3 of which were to the chest and at least 1 of which pierced his heart. The intent to kill could be inferred from these facts alone (see, People v. Ward, 119 A.D.2d 840, 841; People v. Milea, 112 A.D.2d 1011, 1013; People v. Horton, 18 N.Y.2d 355, 359).

Further, the defendant failed to prove that the intent to kill in this instance was mitigated by extreme emotional disturbance. The defendant's own testimony did not indicate that he experienced any extreme emotional disturbance at the time of the incident, or that such feelings would have been reasonable had he experienced them (see, Penal Law § 125.25 [a]; People v Casassa, 49 N.Y.2d 668, 678-679).

We have considered the defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Mangano, J.P., Bracken, Spatt and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. SAVAGE
(Mar 13, 1989)