Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RAYMOND RIVERA, Appellant.

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant's sole argument on appeal is that certain comments made by the prosecutor during summation violated his constitutional rights to equal protection and due process. When the comments were made, defendant made only a general objection. Thus, he failed to preserve his present argument for our review (see, People v Ford, 69 N.Y.2d 775, 776). We reject defendant's contention that the claimed error required no preservation as an error affecting "`the organization of the court or the mode of proceedings prescribed by law'" (People v Ahmed, 66 N.Y.2d 307, 310, quoting People v Patterson, 39 N.Y.2d 288, 295, affd 432 U.S. 197).

Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., and BELLACOSA concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. RIVERA
(Mar 23, 1989)