AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

PATRICIA SCALA, Plaintiff, v. GREYHOUND LINES, INC., et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs, et al., Third-Party Defendant and Second Third-Party Plaintiff, et al., Second Third-Party Defendant. (Action No. 1.) MICHAEL J. CATTI, Plaintiff,

This action, one of three lawsuits arising out of the same incident that were jointly tried, seeks damages for personal injuries suffered by plaintiff Frederick DeChristopher when the Greyhound bus which he was driving was involved in a collision with a tractor trailer owned and operated by defendant Michael Catti. The jury found that Greyhound Lines, Inc., through Frederick DeChristopher, was negligent and was the 100% proximate cause of the accident in question but that Michael Catti, while also negligent, was not a proximate cause of the accident. Damages were thereafter awarded, including $1.5 million for plaintiff Frederick DeChristopher and $1 million for plaintiff Barbara DeChristopher. On appeal, plaintiffs contend, and we agree, that they were deprived of a fair trial as a result of the unprofessional carnival-like atmosphere permeating the entire proceedings. In that regard, language was repeatedly uttered in the course of the trial that was so inflammatory and vituperative as to be more appropriate for a barroom than a courtroom. Indeed, the conduct of the trial frequently became so highly charged and uncontrollable as to preclude an impartial, dispassionate consideration of the evidence by the jury (see, Zaulich v. Thompkins Sq. Holding Co., 10 A.D.2d 492, 497-498). Accordingly, the judgment must be reversed and a new trial held.

Concur — Ross, J.P., Carro, Milonas, Rosenberger and Ellerin, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SCALA v. GREYHOUND LINES, INC
(Apr 6, 1989)