Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

JITNER, Appellant, v. GRANT et ux, Respondents. WESTLAND INVESTMENT COMPANY, Appellant,

PER CURIAM

Award of attorney fees vacated; otherwise affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Plaintiffs appeal from judgments for defendants in these consolidated actions for breach of a putative real estate contract. They contend that the trial court erred by allowing defendants to amend their pleadings to conform to the proof and by directing verdicts for defendants on plaintiffs' claims. Those contentions are without merit.

Plaintiffs also assign error to the court's award of attorney fees to defendants, pursuant to the fee provision in the instrument on which plaintiffs based their actions. Defendants asserted, inter alia, that there was no agreement between the parties and, if there were, that the agreement was invalid. They are not entitled to attorney fees under the provision. See Niedermeyer v. Latimer, 307 Or. 473, 769 P.2d 771 (1989); John Deere Co. v. Epstein, 91 Or. App. 195, 755 P.2d 711 (1988), aff'd 307 Or. 348, 769 P.2d 766 (1989).

Award of attorney fees vacated; otherwise affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

JITNER v. GRANT
(Apr 26, 1989)