Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

Michael RUNCI, pro ami v. Robert VERNAL, et al.

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Robert and Lorraine Vernal appeal from an order of the Superior Court (Piscataquis County, MacInnes, A.R.J.) denying their motion to dissolve an ex parte order of attachment previously granted to Michael Runci by the court (Beaulieu, J.). Because the Vernals fail to demonstrate that Runci's claim is so insubstantial as to foreclose a reasonable chance of recovery, we affirm. Burns v. Smith, 495 A.2d 777, 778 n. 2 (Me. 1985).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

RUNCI v. VERNAL
(May 2, 1989)