Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

SOUTHERN PAN SHORING COMPANY et al. v. JACKSON.

WELTNER, Justice.

The facts of this case are set forth fully in Jackson v. Southern Pan Shoring Co., 258 Ga. 401 ( 369 S.E.2d 239) (1988).

Jackson attempted to exercise a stock purchase warrant in May 1987. Southern Pan initiated a declaratory judgment action challenging the validity of the warrant. This court held that "[t]he trial court ... erred by holding the warrant invalid and erred by denying Jackson's motion for summary judgment on her claim that the warrant is valid and enforceable." Jackson v. Southern Pan Shoring Co., 258 Ga. at 403. Additionally, we entered the following order: "Sarah B. Jackson has filed with this Court a Motion for Restraining Order and Other Equitable Relief, which we decline to reach. The trial court is directed to hear and decide this motion pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-62 (c)."

After hearing, the trial court entered a restraining order against Southern Pan. Following additional motions and hearings, the trial court entered a second order, directing inter alia that Southern Pan relinquish control of the company to Jackson and issue share certificates accordingly. Southern Pan appealed.

These orders were consistent with the order of this court. The trial court did not abuse its discretion, nor exceed the bounds of its lawful authority.

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur, except Bell, J., who concurs in the judgment only.

DECIDED MAY 4, 1989 — RECONSIDERATION DENIED MAY 31, 1989.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SOUTHERN PAN SHORING COMPANY v. JACKSON
(May 4, 1989)