Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION, Complainant, v. Neil A. BANKS, Respondent.

OPINION AND ORDER

STEPHENS, Chief Justice.

In a disciplinary proceeding, the Board of Governors of the Kentucky Bar Association concluded that Banks was guilty of unethical and unprofessional conduct calculated to bring the legal profession of Kentucky into disrepute. The Board recommended that Banks be publicly reprimanded for misconduct in allowing his client, a collection agency, to obtain a judgment against a person for a debt which was not owed.

Having reviewed the Board's decision, and pursuant to SCR 3.370, the court adopts the findings and recommendations of the Board of Governors. Banks is hereby publicly reprimanded and is directed hereby to pay the costs of this proceeding.

All concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KENTUCKY BAR ASS'N v. BANKS
(May 4, 1989)