Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

CITRUS CENTRAL AND PROFESSIONAL ADMINISTRATORS, INC., APPELLANTS, v. ROBERT GARDNER, APPELLEE.

PER CURIAM.

Appellants have moved for remand of this appeal, showing that no transcript of the hearing can be prepared and that the parties and the deputy commissioner have been unable to prepare a satisfactory statement of the evidence. Under the circumstances, we must reverse and remand for a hearing de novo. See Arnold Lumber Company v. Harris, 469 So.2d 786 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

ERVIN, BOOTH and WENTWORTH, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CITRUS CENTRAL v. GARDNER
(May 23, 1989)