BELFONT SALES CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 89-1078.

Attorney(S)

Steven R. Sosnov, Sosnov Associates, Norristown, Pa., argued for plaintiff-appellee. James A. Curley, Commercial Litigation Branch, Dept. of Justice, New York City, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief were John R. Bolton, Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director and Joseph I. Liebman, Atty. in Charge, Intern. Trade Field Office. Also on the brief was Edward N. Maurer, U.S. Customs Service, of counsel.

Judges

Pauline Newman

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 89-1078.

Attorney(S)

Steven R. Sosnov, Sosnov Associates, Norristown, Pa., argued for plaintiff-appellee. James A. Curley, Commercial Litigation Branch, Dept. of Justice, New York City, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief were John R. Bolton, Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director and Joseph I. Liebman, Atty. in Charge, Intern. Trade Field Office. Also on the brief was Edward N. Maurer, U.S. Customs Service, of counsel.

Judges

Pauline Newman

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

BELFONT SALES CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. THE UNITED STATES, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

The United States appeals the decision of the United States Court of International Trade holding that battery-operated quartz analog watches are classified, and dutiable as an entirety, under item 688.45 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States. Belfont Sales Corp. v. United States, 666 F. Supp. 1568 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1987), reh'g denied, 698 F. Supp. 916 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1988). The decision of the Court of International Trade is affirmed, for the reasons stated in that court's published opinion.

AFFIRMED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

BELFONT SALES CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. THE UNITED STATES, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Comments