Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

SHIRLEY D. FRASER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. GERALD F. DEPPE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Defendant, appearing pro se, appeals the order of the trial court executing on defendant's savings and checking accounts because the monies contained therein are exempt from garnishment pursuant to § 513.430(10)(a), RSMo 1986, (exemption of a person's right to receive social security benefits, unemployment compensation or local public assistance). Defendant claims the money contained in his bank accounts consisted entirely of his social security benefits.

Once social security funds have been paid to the recipient, the funds are his personal property and are no longer exempt from execution. Owens v. Owens, 591 S.W.2d 57, 58 (Mo.App. 1979). Defendant's point is, therefore, without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FRASER v. DEPPE
(May 23, 1989)