AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of BERNARD EHRLICH, an Attorney, Respondent. DEPARTMENTAL DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE FOR THE FIRST JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT, Petitioner.

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice law in this State on May 2, 1952, in the Second Judicial Department. At all relevant times herein, respondent has maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.

On January 12, 1989, defendant pleaded guilty to the felony of bribe receiving in the second degree in the Supreme Court, New York County. A certificate evidencing this conviction has been presented to the court. (Judiciary Law § 90 [b].)

Although not yet sentenced, respondent ceased to be an attorney and counselor-at-law upon his conviction of a felony. (Judiciary Law § 90 [a]; Matter of Geller, 97 A.D.2d 306.)

Accordingly, the petition should be granted and respondent's name should be stricken from the roll of attorneys forthwith.

SULLIVAN, J.P., CARRO, ASCH, KASSAL and WALLACH, JJ., concur.

Respondent's name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York forthwith.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF EHRLICH
(May 18, 1989)