AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CURTIS KINARD, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously reversed as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice and new trial granted. Memorandum: Under the facts of this case, defendant is not precluded from raising the issue of the discriminatory exercise of peremptory challenges by the prosecution for the first time on appeal. The issue had been raised at trial by a codefendant and the record indicates that four potential veniremen who are black were peremptorily excused by the prosecutor, leaving an all-white jury to decide the fate of defendant, who is black. Thus, a prima facie case of racial discrimination was set forth under Batson v. Kentucky ( 476 U.S. 79). Because 10 years have passed since this conviction and the Trial Judge has died, we conclude that a reconstruction hearing is impossible. Therefore, defendant is entitled to a new trial (see, People v. Harris, 151 A.D.2d 961).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. KINARD
(Jun 2, 1989)