Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.
The defendant's challenge to the propriety of the plea allocution is not preserved for appellate review since the defendant did not move to withdraw his pleas at any time prior to sentencing (see, People v. Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636). In any event, contrary to the defendant's contentions, the defendant's pleas were knowingly and voluntarily entered after the court fully advised him of his rights and elicited a sufficient factual statement from him concerning the circumstances of the charged crimes (see, People v. Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9).
The defendant's contention that the sentences imposed are excessive, is similarly without merit particularly in view of the fact that the sentences were negotiated for by the defendant (see, People v. Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816). In any event, in view of the circumstances of the crimes, the sentencing court did not abuse its discretion in imposing concurrent sentences of 2 1/2 to 5 years' imprisonment (see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80). Mollen, P.J., Bracken, Rubin, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.