Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

IN the INTEREST OF R.H., III, a person under the age of 18: T.H., Appellant, v. LA CROSSE COUNTY, Respondent-Petitioner. [Case No. 88-0372.] IN the INTEREST OF L.H., a person under the age of 18: L.H., Appellant,

(Affirming 147 Wis.2d 22, 433 N.W.2d 16 (Ct.App. 1988).)

PER CURIAM.

The court is equally divided on the question of whether the decision of the court of appeals, 147 Wis.2d 22, 433 N.W.2d 16 (Ct.App. 1988), should be affirmed or reversed. Chief Justice NATHAN S. HEFFERNAN, Justice SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, and Justice WILLIAM G. CALLOW being of the opinion that the decision should be affirmed, and Justice ROLAND B. DAY, Justice DONALD W. STEINMETZ, and Justice LOUIS J. CECI being of the opinion that the decision should be reversed. Justice WILLIAM A. BABLITCH did not participate.

Decision affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN INTEREST OF R.H
(Jun 23, 1989)