JONES v. MERRICK CONSTRUCTION CO

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 88-386.

Attorney(S)

Neblett, Beard Arsenault, David O. Walker,
Fuhrer, Flournoy, Hunter Morton, Philip Hunter, Alexandria, for plaintiff-
Gist, Methvin, Hughes Munsterman, Howard Gist, III, Alexandria, for defendant-
Abbott, Webb, Best Meeks, David J. Gorewitz, New Orleans, Mayer, Smith Robert, Caldwell Roberts, Shreveport, for defendant-

Judges

DOMENGEAUX, Judge.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 88-386.

Attorney(S)

Neblett, Beard Arsenault, David O. Walker,
Fuhrer, Flournoy, Hunter Morton, Philip Hunter, Alexandria, for plaintiff-
Gist, Methvin, Hughes Munsterman, Howard Gist, III, Alexandria, for defendant-
Abbott, Webb, Best Meeks, David J. Gorewitz, New Orleans, Mayer, Smith Robert, Caldwell Roberts, Shreveport, for defendant-

Judges

DOMENGEAUX, Judge.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

HAROLD JONES, PLAINTIFF, v. MERRICK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, CITY OF ALEXANDRIA, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.

DOMENGEAUX, Judge.

This case was consolidated with the suit entitled Jones v. Merrick Construction Company, et at, 546 So.2d 928 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1989), also decided on this date.

For the reasons assigned in the aforesaid case, the judgment appealed from in the instant case is reversed. The case is remanded to the trial court for consideration of the merits.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

HAROLD JONES, PLAINTIFF, v. MERRICK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, CITY OF ALEXANDRIA, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.

Comments