Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of JAMES KRAUSKOPF, Indi v. dually and as Commissioner of the New York City Human Resources Administration, et al., Appellants,

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

We agree, for the reasons stated by Justice Ann T. Mikoll at the Appellate Division ( 139 A.D.2d 147), that the Department of Social Services did not violate procedural requirements in adopting a definition of "mental disability" for the purpose of reimbursement eligibility pursuant to Social Services Law § 368-a; and that the definition adopted by the Department of Social Services is neither irrational nor arbitrary.

Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., and BELLACOSA concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF KRAUSKOPF v. PERALES
(Jun 30, 1989)