Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

TIMOTHY VANHORN, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE.

PER CURIAM.

Upon the state's commendable concession that the sentences appealed from in this case are, in effect, invalid under this court's decision in Harrison v. State, 523 So.2d 726 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988), the sentences under review are therefore reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court with directions to resentence the defendant Timothy Vanhorn within the sentencing guidelines range of 5 1/2 to 7 years imprisonment.

The state, however, disagrees with Harrison and reserves the right to seek further review of the decision we reach herein. We certify that our decision is "in direct conflict with . . . decision[s] of other district court[s] of appeal" in Brown v. State, 535 So.2d 332 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Dyer v. State, 534 So.2d 843 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); and Waldron v. State, 529 So.2d 772 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988), so as to permit further review by the Florida Supreme Court pursuant to Article V, section 3(b)(4) of the Florida Constitution.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

VANHORN v. STATE
(Jul 11, 1989)