AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. HERMAN PALMER, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The trial court properly allowed the People to amend counts 5 and 6 of the indictment to correct the date on which the alleged crimes took place (see, CPL 200.70; People v Powell, 137 A.D.2d 730; People v Robinson, 119 A.D.2d 598, 599, lv denied 68 N.Y.2d 816; People v Leon, 115 A.D.2d 907, 908). The amendment did not in any way change the theory of the prosecution's case and defendant failed to demonstrate any credible way in which he would be prejudiced if an adjournment was not granted (People v Clapper, 123 A.D.2d 484, 485, lv denied 69 N.Y.2d 825; People v Leon, supra, at 908).

We have reviewed the other claims raised by defendant and find them to be without merit.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. PALMER
(Jul 12, 1989)