Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Da v. d L. BEATTY, et al.

APPEAL ERROR — APPEAL DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE BECAUSE IT DID NOT INVOLVE AN APPEALABLE ORDER, THE RECORD WAS INSUFFICIENT, AND IT APPEARED THAT THE PARTIES WERE ASKING FOR AN ADVISORY OPINION. — Where the appeal was not shown to involve an appealable order, the record was insufficient, and it appeared that the parties were asking for an advisory opinion, the appeal was dismissed without prejudice to proceed further in the trial court.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is dismissed because it is not shown to involve an appealable order, the record is insufficient, and it appears that the parties are asking us for an advisory opinion.

The appeal is dismissed without prejudice to proceed further in the trial court.

NEWBERN, J., not participating.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BEATTY v. CLINTON
(Jul 17, 1989)