Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
A review of the record indicates, contrary to the defendant's contention, that the court correctly charged the jury on accomplice testimony and the required corroboration thereof. The jury was instructed to view the inherent trustworthiness of the accomplice's testimony with suspicion, and furthermore was instructed that corroboration by a credible source was necessary (see, 1 CJI[NY] 7.52, at 337-339).
The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05) or without merit. Mangano, J.P., Eiber, Sullivan and Balletta, JJ., concur.