AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

RICHARD P. MARACINA, Indi v. dually and Doing Business as MARACINA, LASSIN ATLAS, et al., Appellants,

By memorandum decision and order dated November 29, 1984, this court granted plaintiff partial summary judgment on the issue of liability and ordered an assessment of damages in Supreme Court ( 105 A.D.2d 672). Jury selection was completed on April 25, 1989, and the case was assigned for trial to Justice Carol E. Huff. On May 1, 1989, before there had been any opening statements, or other proceedings before the jury, the court orally granted a motion to dismiss the complaint. Three days later, on May 4, 1989, the court entered a written order, reading as follows: "Upon the Court's own motion after trial, settle order/judgment [sic]". As noted, no trial had ever taken place.

The respondent cites no authority, and indeed, none exists, to support the Trial Judge's disregard of the earlier order of this court. Trial courts are without authority to vacate or modify orders of the Appellate Division, or to reverse holdings of this court.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Ross, Asch, Rosenberger and Wallach, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MARACINA v. SCHIRRMEISTER
(Jul 27, 1989)