AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

STATE OF MISSOURI, PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT, v. MARK A. VANSICKLE, DEFENDANT/APPELLANT.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Mark Vansickle, appeals from the trial court's order revoking his probation and sentencing him to six months in the St. Charles County Jail. The State has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal.

Defendant does not challenge the sufficiency of the charge against him nor the jurisdiction of the trial court. Other asserted errors, as here, in probation revocation proceedings must be challenged by a writ of habeas corpus not by a direct appeal. E.g. State v. Henderson, 750 S.W.2d 507, 516 (Mo.App. 1988); State v. Morgan, 654 S.W.2d 326 (Mo.App. 1983); Boyer v. State, 646 S.W.2d 388 (Mo.App. 1983).

An extended opinion would serve no precedential value. The State's motion to dismiss is granted. Rule 84.16(b).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. VANSICKLE
(Aug 15, 1989)