AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

EDWARD C. ABELL, JR., AND CAREY WALTON, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, CROSS-APPELLANTS v. POTOMAC INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, JOE E. FRYAR AND WRIGHT, LINDSEY JENNINGS AND VALLEY FORGE INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, CROSS-APPELLEES.

PER CURIAM:

The Supreme Court has vacated our judgment and has remanded for further consideration in light of H.J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Tel. Co., ___ U.S. ___, 109 S.Ct. 2893, 106 L.Ed.2d 195 (1989). See Fryar v. Abell, 109 S.Ct. 3236, 106 L.Ed.2d 584 (1989). Following remand, the parties have advised us of a pending bankruptcy proceeding involving defendant Joe E. Fryar.

This cause is REMANDED to the district court for further consideration in light of H.J. Inc. The district court shall also consider the appropriate disposition of this matter in light of the pending bankruptcy proceeding.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ABELL v. POTOMAC INSURANCE COMPANY
(Sep 12, 1989)