Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Pursuant to the prior order of this court (Sullivan v Board of Educ., 131 A.D.2d 836), the plaintiff served an amended notice of claim and amended complaint to remedy omissions in the originals (see, General Municipal Law § 50-e; Tucker v Long Is. R.R. Co., 128 A.D.2d 517). The claims asserted in the amended complaint are based upon the same transactions and occurrences as the claims asserted in the original notice of claim and complaint. Since the defendants were provided with timely notice of the transactions and occurrences giving rise to the claims asserted in the amended complaint, it may properly be deemed to have been timely interposed pursuant to the relation-back provision of CPLR 203 (e) (see, Caffaro v Trayna, 35 N.Y.2d 245). Kunzeman, J.P., Rubin, Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur.