Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Upon our review of the record, we conclude that the Supreme Court properly directed the defendant National Advertising Company to remove the billboard sign which it constructed upon plaintiff's property without first obtaining all necessary governmental approvals, and properly enjoined it from erecting any further sign structure on the plaintiff's property during the pendency of this action. The record discloses that the plaintiff has a likelihood of success on the merits (see, Matter of National Adv. Co. v Blankfein, 155 A.D.2d 544 [decided herewith]), that the plaintiff will suffer irreparable injury absent preliminary injunctive relief, and that the balance of equities is in the plaintiff's favor (see, Grant Co. v Srogi, 52 N.Y.2d 496, 517; Matter of Brenner v Hart Sys., 114 A.D.2d 363). Mangano, J.P., Thompson, Spatt and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.