Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

KEATON v. THE STATE.

BENHAM, Judge.

The sole issue in this case is whether appellant's conviction for aggravated battery merges as a matter of fact with his conviction for armed robbery. We find it does not, and affirm.

The evidence of record authorized the jury to find that appellant entered a store, menaced the proprietress with a knife while telling her she would not be hurt if she gave him all the money in the store, required her to take the money from the register and hand it to him, then directed her to enter a storeroom, where he stabbed her numerous times, causing permanent injuries. Since the evidence shows that the robbery was complete before the stabbings occurred, and the evidence of neither offense was necessary to prove the other, there is no merger. McCulligh v. State, 169 Ga. App. 717 (4) ( 314 S.E.2d 724) (1984); Dunbar v. State, 163 Ga. App. 243 (2) ( 292 S.E.2d 897) (1982); Miller v. State, 155 Ga. App. 54 (5) ( 270 S.E.2d 466) (1980).

Judgment affirmed. Deen, P. J., and Birdsong, J., concur.

DECIDED NOVEMBER 20, 1989.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KEATON v. STATE
(Nov 20, 1989)