Mandamus — Attorneys at law — Assignment of counsel for indigent defendants — Crim. R. 44 and Loc. R. 33 — Alleged noncompliance with assignment system — Judgment reversed and cause remanded when claim for relief shown.
Upon review of the matter presented to us, we find that appellant, Russell R. Kirtz, has stated a claim for relief. The judgment of the court of appeals dismissing appellant's complaint in mandamus is reversed and this cause is remanded to that court for further proceedings.
MOYER, C.J., SWEENEY, HOLMES, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, H. BROWN and RESNICK, JJ., concur.