AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

FRANK ACKLEY, D/B/A VILLAGE SQUARE CHEVRON, ROBERT A. BLOSIO, D/B/A LONG RIDGE CHEVRON, INC., JAMES D. CHAYKA, D/B/A HOME GULF SERVICE, INC., ROBERT COHN, D/B/A FAIRPORT GULF, VINCENT CONDITO, D/B/A VINNY'S COURTLAND SERVICE, GEORGE S. LOMBARDO, JR., D/B/A AVON CHEVRON SERVICE, INC., PAUL A. MORELLO, SR., D/B/A MORELLO'S GULF/MORELLO'S SERVICE STATION, DOUGLAS SCHLEY, D/B/A FAIRFIELD GULF, JOHN J. TODD III, D/B/A DANBURY GULF, INC., GEORGE WILLIAMSON, D/B/A GEORGE WILLIAMSON AUTO ELECTRIC, INC., THOMAS S. ZAWATSKI, D/B/A COS COB GULF, DAVID MAGUIRE, D/B/A AL BILL'S GULF SERVICE, INC., KENNETH CERRITELLI, D/B/A CERRITELLI CHEVRON SERVICE, INC., SANTO J. CIARCIA, D/B/A GLASTONBURY CHEVRON, DONALD HAVILAND, D/B/A CHEVRON CAR WASH OF NEW CANAAN AND FREDERICK O'NEIL, D/B/A CHEVRON CAR WASH, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. GULF OIL CORPORATION, CHEVRON U.S.A., INC., AND CUMBERLAND FARMS, INC., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES.

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiffs-appellants, fourteen Connecticut service station operators (hereafter the "Dealers"), appeal from a summary judgment entered in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Burns, Ch. J.) in favor of defendants-appellees Gulf Oil Corporation, Chevron U.S.A., Inc., and Cumberland Farms, Inc. In three separate actions, later consolidated, the Dealers alleged claims grounded in violations of the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 2801-2841 (1982) (hereafter "PMPA"), and pendent state law claims. They challenge the transfer to Cumberland Farms of their franchise agreements with Chevron, arguing that the assignment was invalid under the PMPA and under Connecticut law. First they argue that the assignment effected a termination of the franchises within the meaning of the PMPA, since it substantially altered the franchise relationship and was thus in valid under the Uniform Commercial Code, see Conn.Gen.Stat.Ann. § 42a-2-210 (West 1960). Second, they contend that they are entitled to the right of first refusal to purchase the properties under section 2802(b)(2)(E)(iii) of the PMPA. Third, they assert that defendants' actions violated the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act, Conn.Gen.Stat.Ann. §§ 42-110a to 42-110q (West 1987). Fourth, they argue that their franchises were automatically renewed under Connecticut law, see Connecticut Petroleum Franchise Act, Conn.Gen.Stat.Ann. §§ 42-133j to 42-133n (West 1987), and that Cumberland's imposition of significant rental increases violated the PMPA and state law.

All these arguments were rejected in the comprehensive and well-reasoned opinion of Chief Judge Ellen Bree Burns. See Ackley v. Gulf Oil Corp., 726 F.Supp. 353 (D.Conn. 1989). We affirm substantially for the reasons given in that opinion.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ACKLEY, v. GULF OIL CORPORATION
(Nov 27, 1989)