AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

CARLOS E. MALDONADO, Appellant, v. GABRIEL SUNSHINE et al., Respondents.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The action arose out of an incident on July 25, 1985, when a vehicle owned by the defendant Gabriel Sunshine and operated by the defendant Alison Sunshine struck the plaintiff Carlos Enrique Maldonado as he was crossing Glen Cove Road, a four-lane roadway in Nassau County.

According to the plaintiff, he had crossed half the roadway and was waiting on the double yellow line for a clearing in the traffic so that he could cross the second half of the roadway when he was struck by the defendants' car. According to the defendant driver, she was driving in the left northbound lane when she saw the plaintiff running across the street. She applied the brakes but could not avoid colliding with the plaintiff as he ran in front of her car.

The jury apparently determined that the defendant driver's version was credible, that the defendant driver was faced with an emergency situation, and that she acted as a reasonably prudent person would act under the same emergency circumstances and was therefore not negligent. Since the verdict is one that could have been reached by a fair interpretation of the evidence, it should not be disturbed (see, Nicastro v Park, 113 A.D.2d 129, 134).

In addition, the plaintiff's contention that the court improperly charged the jury as to the emergency doctrine with regard to the defendant driver is unpreserved for appellate review and we decline to reach it in the exercise of our discretionary power to review it in the interest of justice. Mangano, J.P., Bracken, Kunzeman and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MALDONADO v. SUNSHINE
(Dec 4, 1989)