AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. TREVIS MOORE, Appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the County Court properly denied his application to withdraw his guilty plea. Although the defendant alleged that he was coerced into pleading guilty by his attorney, his conclusory claims were not supported by evidence (see, People v Irizzary, 125 A.D.2d 589; People v Bangert, 107 A.D.2d 752). Moreover, the defendant conceded during the plea and sentencing proceedings that he had ample opportunity to discuss his plea with counsel, that counsel had fully explained matters to him, that counsel had informed him of his slim chances for a favorable trial verdict and recommended that he plead guilty, that counsel had advised him that the ultimate decision of whether to plead guilty or go to trial was his alone, and that counsel had promised to do his best in defending him if the defendant chose the latter option. Hence, the defendant's own statements refute his present contention, and his motion to withdraw his plea was properly denied. Thompson, J.P., Bracken, Brown, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. MOORE
(Dec 4, 1989)