AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

GLORIA M. LaGRECA, Respondent, v. HERMAN EBELING, Appellant.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

In answer to the defendant's demand for a bill of particulars, the plaintiff alleges that the injuries she sustained as a result of the accident are serious injuries within the definition of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) in that they are permanent injuries. The plaintiff, however, has failed to present any proof to show that her injuries are permanent. Her doctor's affidavit states only that "[h]er prognosis remains guarded". Accordingly, the defendant is entitled to summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff's complaint (see, Zoldas v Louise Cab Corp., 108 A.D.2d 378; De Filippo v White, 101 A.D.2d 801; see also, Epstein v Butera, 155 A.D.2d 513). Mollen, P.J., Rubin, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LaGRECA v. EBELING
(Dec 4, 1989)