AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANTOINE MOORE, Appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's claim that the verdict sheet submitted to the jury was not proper is unpreserved for appellate review since he failed to object to its submission (see, CPL 470.05; People v Battles, 141 A.D.2d 748).

We have examined the defendant's remaining arguments with regard to the court's charge and the prosecutor's conduct, and find them to be either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit (see, CPL 470.05; People v Galloway, 54 N.Y.2d 396, 401; People v Baldo, 107 A.D.2d 751; People v Gonzalez, 133 A.D.2d 123). Mangano, J.P., Thompson, Spatt and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. MOORE
(Dec 11, 1989)