AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

In the Matter of STEPHEN M. TALT, Appellant, v. STATE DIVISION OF HUMAN RIGHTS et al., Respondents.

Adjudged that the order is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

A review of the record discloses substantial evidence to support the determination of the State Division of Human Rights that the petitioner was not dismissed from his position as a probationary police officer as a result of any unlawful discriminatory practice. The petitioner failed to meet his burden of showing that the independent, legitimate and non-discriminatory reasons proffered by the New Rochelle Police Department were not its true reasons but merely a pretext for discrimination (see, Matter of Miller Brewing Co. v State Div. of Human Rights, 66 N.Y.2d 937; Matter of Pace Coll. v Commissioner of Human Rights, 38 N.Y.2d 28). The determination of the Division must therefore be confirmed. Sullivan, J.P., Harwood, Balletta and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF TALT v. STATE DIV. OF HUMAN RIGHTS
(Dec 18, 1989)