Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The uncontroverted testimony at the hearing established that the telephone call in question was never memorialized. Thus, the defendant is not entitled to a reversal of the judgment of conviction on the theory that material to which she was entitled under People v Rosario (supra) was withheld from her.
We have considered the defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Mangano, J.P., Brown, Eiber and Harwood, JJ., concur.