Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

PAUL BRAMMER, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant raises error only as to the sentence imposed for count I of his multi-count conviction. He was orally sentenced on that count to five years probation with the first 364 days to be served in county jail. However, appellant's written sentence for count I indicates a sentence of 364 days followed by five years probation.

As the parties agree, when there is a discrepancy between the written sentence and the oral pronouncement of sentence, the latter prevails. See Bogan v. State, 462 So.2d 115 (Fla.2d DCA 1985). Therefore, we remand with directions to conform the written sentence as to count I to the oral pronouncement of sentence. Otherwise, affirmed.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BRAMMER v. STATE
(Jan 5, 1990)