AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

HARRY MACKLOWE, Respondent, v. 42ND STREET DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION et al., Appellants.

Plaintiff, sole general partner of a limited partnership known as Elfon Realty Co. (Elfon), brought this action against defendant 42nd Street Development Corporation, sole limited partner of Elfon, claiming that it improperly assigned its right to receive partnership distributions to defendant William J. Condren without the express consent of plaintiff, in violation of express conditions of the partnership agreement. Defendants counterclaimed for breach of fiduciary duty and for an accounting. Defendant 42nd Street then sought production of partnership records, and plaintiff moved for a protective order.

Contrary to defendants' contentions, a limited partner is entitled to an accounting only "whenever circumstances render it just and reasonable" (Partnership Law § 99 [b]). The court could thus properly find that, under the circumstances herein, the assignment was sufficient misconduct to bar defendant from viewing the documents at this stage of the litigation. Further, a party may not seek, through discovery, the ultimate relief sought on the merits of its action for an accounting (Wolther v Samuel, 110 A.D.2d 506, 507 [1st Dept 1985]).

Concur — Ellerin, J.P., Wallach, Smith and Rubin, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MACKLOWE v. 42ND STREET DEVELOPMENT CORP
(Jan 23, 1990)