Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant's sole contention on appeal is that the suppression court erred in finding that her written statement was not induced by a promise that, if she cooperated, she would be released. Law enforcement witnesses denied making any promises, and defendant's contrary testimony merely presented a credibility question for the court to resolve. The court's resolution of that issue in favor of the People is supported by the record and should not be disturbed (see, People v Woods, 141 A.D.2d 588, 589, lv denied 72 N.Y.2d 1051; People v Vail, 90 A.D.2d 917).