AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

STANLEY ROSS, Appellant, v. MEDICAL LIABILITY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 150 A.D.2d 187). To the extent that appellant has preserved his argument for our review, we add only that preclusive effect may be given to issues that were actually litigated, squarely addressed and specifically decided (compare, Malloy v Trombley, 50 N.Y.2d 46, 50-53, with O'Connor v G R Packing Co., 53 N.Y.2d 278, 282-284).

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., and BELLACOSA.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ROSS v. MEDICAL LIABILITY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
(Feb 8, 1990)