Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
An examination of the record leads us to conclude that the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting the plaintiff's motion to substitute the executor of the estate of Fannie Criaris as a party plaintiff in place of Fannie Criaris and in allowing the late filing of a notice of medical malpractice action (see, Egrini v Brookhaven Mem. Hosp., 133 A.D.2d 610; Tewari v Tsoutsouras, 75 N.Y.2d 1). Mangano, J.P., Kunzeman, Eiber and Kooper, JJ., concur.