AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DEREK KELLY, Appellant.

Defendant has failed to demonstrate that the court abused its discretion in denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea (People v Frederick, 45 N.Y.2d 520). In support of such motion, defendant alleged only that he had been coerced and threatened to plead guilty by counsel and that he was experiencing fear from some unspecified source. That counsel made defendant aware of his sentencing exposure cannot be a basis for finding coercion. And, while the pressures of considering a plea may be stressful, they do not constitute duress or coercion (People v Parker, 85 A.D.2d 565).

Defendant's remaining arguments have not been preserved for review (People v Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636, 637), and we decline to reach them. In any event, if we were to consider these arguments in the interest of justice, we would find them to be without merit, in view of defendant's direct admission of pulling the trigger and express waiver of his right to a jury trial.

Concur — Kupferman, J.P., Asch, Wallach, Smith and Rubin, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. KELLY
(Mar 1, 1990)