Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We have reviewed both the sworn warrant application of the police officer and the affidavit of the informant sworn to before the issuing Magistrate and find that they provided information sufficient to support a reasonable belief that evidence of illegal activity would be present at the specific time and place of the search (see, People v Edwards, 69 N.Y.2d 814, 816). The informant's sworn statement was properly considered by the suppression court and need not have been disclosed to defendant (see, People v Diaz, 147 A.D.2d 912, lv denied 73 N.Y.2d 1014; People v Delgado, 134 A.D.2d 951, lv denied 71 N.Y.2d 895); an independent review of the facts presented is all that is required (see, People v Fino, 14 N.Y.2d 160, 163).