Ordered that the order is reversed, as an exercise of discretion in the interest of justice, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the defendant New York City Housing Authority, without costs or disbursements.
The purported complaint herein was served more than 3 1/2 years after the plaintiff was served with a written demand therefor (see, CPLR 3012 [b]), and then only in response to the instant motion to dismiss. The plaintiff offered neither an excuse for this inordinate delay, nor an affidavit of merits. Moreover, even if we were to conclude that the verified complaint constituted an adequate substitute for an affidavit of merit (see, Egan v Federated Dept. Stores, 108 A.D.2d 718), under the circumstances of this case we find that the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying the motion to dismiss (see, CPLR 3012 [d]). Brown, J.P., Eiber, Balletta and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.