AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

ALICE MEEKER et al., Appellants, v. ROBERT J. MOORE, Respondent.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for determination of the plaintiffs' damages and entry of an appropriate judgment.

In order to be relieved from his default in answering the complaint, the defendant was required to submit an acceptable excuse for his default as well as an affidavit indicating that he had a meritorious defense to the action (see, Fidelity Deposit Co. v. Andersen Co., 60 N.Y.2d 693; Pansey v. RKO Gen., 102 A.D.2d 762). The defendant failed to satisfy either of these requirements, and there is nothing in the record which indicates that there is any merit to his position (cf., Sanders Assocs. v. Hague Dev. Corp., 100 A.D.2d 964).

We further note that, contrary to the defendant's argument, CPLR 3020 (b) is clearly inapplicable to the complaint herein, and therefore the defendant was not entitled to completely ignore the complaint because it was unverified. Mangano, P.J., Bracken, Kooper and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MEEKER v. MOORE
(Apr 9, 1990)