PER CURIAM.
The imposition of costs against this appellant is reversed for the reasons set forth in Anderson v. State, 556 So.2d 527 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). The sentence is otherwise affirmed. See King v. State, 557 So.2d 899 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990).
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED.
DAUKSCH, COBB and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.