We find no error in the trial court's charge on "momentary forgetfulness", which was given at the request of the plaintiff. In any event, any error in the language of the charge as given could not have prejudiced the plaintiff, since the jury never reached the issue of her comparative negligence. Similarly, the court's charge to the jury to consider the negligence of the City of New York, a nonparty, even if error, could not have prejudiced the plaintiff, since the jury never reached the issue of contribution among joint tort-feasors. Nor do we find that any of the other claimed errors warrant reversal.
Concur — Ross, J.P., Carro, Rosenberger, Ellerin and Smith, JJ.