Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. CONNIE LOU LUNSKI, Appellant.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals from a conviction for contributing to the sexual delinquency of a minor. ORS 163.435. She argues that the trial court erred by failing to specify in its sentence the amount of restitution that she would be required to pay as a condition of her probation. She concedes that she did not make an objection in the trial court, pursuant to ORS 137.106 (3). Her failure to object was a waiver of her rights under that statute. See State v. Carpenter, 101 Or. App. 489, 791 P.2d 145 (1990).

We do not address defendant's other assignment of error, because it lacks merit.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. LUNSKI
(May 2, 1990)