Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MATTHEW ALEXANDER, Appellant.

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People and indulging all reasonable inferences in the People's favor (see, People v Ford, 66 N.Y.2d 428, 437; People v Benzinger, 36 N.Y.2d 29, 32), we conclude that the evidence is legally sufficient to support defendant's conviction for first degree robbery (Penal Law § 160.15) and second degree murder (Penal Law § 125.25) beyond a reasonable doubt. No other issue has been preserved for our review.

Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., and BELLACOSA concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), order affirmed in a memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. ALEXANDER
(May 3, 1990)