Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. WILLIAMS.

Attorneys at law — Misconduct — Public reprimand — Acquiring a proprietary interest in a matter undertaken for a client, accepting compensation from one other than a client and engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice.

Per Curiam.

Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we agree with the board's findings of misconduct and its recommendation. Accordingly, respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded for having violated DR 5-103(A), 5-107(A)(1), and 1-102(A)(5). Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

MOYER, C.J., SWEENEY, HOLMES, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, H. BROWN and RESNICK, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. WILLIAMS
(May 9, 1990)